View Full Version : I say we should have a new rule...
VR1
17th March 2005, 09:20 PM
and that would be that you cannot mention a web page or anything else that might be considered promotion of a product or service until you have posted at least 5 times. Otherwise instant death will be the result. :smt070
Shiola
17th March 2005, 10:01 PM
I'll go with that. I'm going to see if there's a modification on the forum software that can force death upon any perpetrators.
VR1
17th March 2005, 10:12 PM
OK but be careful, last time you fiddled with the forum didn't you delete it or something?
Shiola
17th March 2005, 11:40 PM
I see my reputation preceeds me. Tis true, I am forum retarded, which isn't too great when you run a forum.
staticxess
18th March 2005, 02:08 AM
and that would be that you cannot mention a web page or anything else that might be considered promotion of a product or service until you have posted at least 5 times. Otherwise instant death will be the result. :smt070
I think that's a good rule.
I see my reputation preceeds me. Tis true, I am forum retarded, which isn't too great when you run a forum.
Nah, not forum retarded Ben, just forum disabled....
Drunkpup
18th March 2005, 10:24 AM
I think that is a brilliant rule.
crazyrussian
18th March 2005, 12:17 PM
good idea...damn spammers
washing up liquid
18th March 2005, 05:35 PM
aww poor ben not being good with forums, we r not all perfect (i say that alot)
VR1
18th March 2005, 07:58 PM
Well I think it's pretty unanimous. We kill all spammers to death. :smt072
dontpanic
19th March 2005, 12:39 AM
Well I think it's pretty unanimous. We kill all spammers to death. :smt072
Actually, I vote that we amend the rule to allow spammers to post only in the Spamtastic forum. It would really eliminate the middle-man of us posting the spam we receive.
Seleney
22nd March 2005, 09:06 AM
Actually, I vote that we amend the rule to allow spammers to post only in the Spamtastic forum. It would really eliminate the middle-man of us posting the spam we receive.
Well that is what it's there for, is it not?
cryotek
22nd March 2005, 10:00 AM
Thats really for say posting emails that are spam i suppose. however, reguardless if you have a designated place for spam, people won't listen, they'll just do as they please.
Shiola
22nd March 2005, 02:26 PM
Yeah, I don't think they'll listen. The only place where spammers haven't posted in is in the Spamtastic section. I could move all spam threads in there though?
Hammer
22nd March 2005, 02:38 PM
Spam, egg & chips mmmmmmm
After we kill the spammers can we cut them up and mince them? Just a thought, that'll teach 'em.
dontpanic
22nd March 2005, 11:34 PM
however, reguardless if you have a designated place for spam, people won't listen, they'll just do as they please.
Thus reinforcing the anarchy of shiola.com.
staticxess
23rd March 2005, 01:30 AM
Spam, egg & chips mmmmmmm
After we kill the spammers can we cut them up and mince them? Just a thought, that'll teach 'em.
I have a theory that spammers are the secret ingredient in Spam. :spam1:
vBulletin® v3.7.3, Copyright ©2000-2010, Jelsoft Enterprises Ltd.