Profile of Light, 1967
by Barnett Newman

Name of Esteemed Art Critic:

Your Critique of
Profile of Light, 1967 by Barnett Newman:

<< previous 15 critiques

Den Watts
COULD NOT AGREE MORE !

The Faux Artist
Is modern art crap? FauxArtist.co.uk ... Follow the experiment!!

Vtwin
rubbish, a baby could have done this.

Thomas J Wright
Simplistic work doesn't automatically make it 'simply profound'. The assumption of the possession of profundity in modern minimalist work is absurd.

It is like assuming that a given slab of tarmac on the road is profound because of its pure texture and appearance - yet it is no more arbitrary then much of this work is.

Two lines of colour can only ever hold so much meaning, and anyone who argues otherwise is either a fool or a con-artist.

ThisPaintingIsShit
HOLY HELL TWO RECTANGLES GENIUS

RSj
probably took longer to come up with a name then to paint this crap,thats including washing the brushes.


john
Its the bars of a jail cell, clearly anyone who would buy this crap would need locking up

kim
This looks like a pregnancy test strip. If he's having triples do you think he will be inspired to paint a crooked triangle?

lwr
the number 11?

sobico
What a crock of shit ... and to think that some prick would actually buy this crap.

Harry
pathetic

Sam
What a load of flea-infested maggot-multiplying bowl of drog fog shit!

Annie
This is a masterpiece! Of comedic genius. Modern art and this, it's archetypical embodiment, is a huge joke. They're all in on it those 'artists', or 'sociopaths'. This is really funny. The appalingly lacking mastery of painting, and the contrived name. What breed of fuckery is this ? And I swear if i hear one more defender of modern art say that it is not what is on the canvas, it is the DEEP MEANING INHERENT, I will bust a cap in the bitches ass.

napoleon dynamite
fuck me sideways !
so if i did summat like this in my gcse's i' of got a A*
fuck off lmao

phoe
shit

<< previous 15 critiques